Coming to Terms with Berlin's Past

The Berliner Schloss is a landmark that really interested me while watching the documentary. Castles are a major part of Germany because the country was split into many smaller provinces before unification. The county’s history is rich with castle and is typically celebrated by the country and tourists. But, the Berliner Schloss fell in the Russian zone of Berlin after WWII. Since the castle symbolized everything the communist regime was against, it was decided that the castle was to be demolished.

Berliner Schloss
http://www.robothek.de/Schloss/Original.JPG

The SED then built a cultural center for East Berlin where the castle once stood. That building was later demolished after the reunification of Germany and the castle is now being rebuilt.

The Palace of the Republic
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/01/09/arts/Ouro3650.jpg

The story of these buildings to me symbolizes the struggle that Germans have with their past. To East Germans, the castle symbolized an oppressive, imperial, and militarized rule. While the cultural center served as a symbol to the future and community. To West Germans, the castle was a symbol of pride for their past and for Fredrick the Great. The cultural center was a symbol of the oppressive, communist regime in the east. At one point in the documentary two Germans share opposing views about the buildings and I believe these two embody the struggle of the German people. Should Germany move forward and forget their past because the past is filled horrors, mistake, and war? Or should Germany honor their past in order to never forget what happened and find moments in their past to be proud of? It is almost as if some Germans will feel guilty if they honor past. But, I think it is important to face the past and comes to terms with it in order to move forward with life. To ignore the past is to act as if it never happened.

            Thinking of Berlin as a mecca for freedom is not something the general public typically thinks about. But, it was just that in the 1600’s. In order for Berlin to gain a population, the ruler offered freedom to those prosecuted for religious reasons among others. This led to a large Jewish community in Berlin. The liberal ideals of Berlin were continued by Frederick the Great. But, he also brought militarized ideals as well. These two conflicting ideals get to the heart of Berlin throughout its history. One side of Berlin is wildly liberal; focused on freedoms of choice, sexuality, thought, and life. The other side of Berlin is covered in anger and bloodshed that stem from the militarized ideals. How can one city have two completely separate tracks that never intersect in a positive way? We can examine Berlin in the 1920’s, which was a sexual revolution in the world. But, once the Nazi party came into Berlin to fight against this liberalism, the face of Berlin changed dramatically. The ideals of Berlin seem to flip flop from one extreme to another. To this day Berlin deals with clashes in the streets, while still being a mecca for liberal freedoms. I think it is important to understand both ideals that Berlin has had woven into its history because it can help us understand the history of Berlin and what it means to be a Berliner. 

Martin Luther and the Church

Martin Luther and his conflicts with the Church is something I have studied at length in my previous German courses. Every time I revisit this topic the same thing always sticks out to me; Martin Luther fought for Germans to have a personal relationship with God. He felt the Church was creating fear in order to secure more money for them to live in luxury. The Germans believed that their souls were in constant danger of going to Hell if they did not follow the ways and guidelines that the Church laid out for them. Every step of their lives were guided exactly how the Church wanted them to be and that included giving money to the Church. Germans at the time were incredibly superstitious and Martin Luther believed the Church exploited these superstitions for financial gain.

Before Martin Luther’s writings Germans believed they must fully follow the Church in order to reach salvation at the end of their lives. Luther believed quite the opposite. However, it is important to note that Luther was never against the Bible or God, only against the Church as a political structure.  When Luther translated the Bible from Latin to German that opened an entire new world to a majority of Germans who previously could not read the word of God for themselves. It allowed them to bring God into their homes in a more personal way than before. Germans could read the words and interpret on their own. Rather than have a clergy member give the Church’s interpretation of the word of God. The German’s began to find truth in what Luther was preaching and wanted to take the power for themselves. Why should one giant enterprise hold the power and strike fear into the hearts of its followers? The Germans were able to learn from their own readings of the Bible what they truly believed was right from the word of God.

Luther nailing the 95 Thesis
http://cdn.gospelherald.com/data/images/full/3982/image.jpg?w=720

Luther’s stand against the Church also served as a symbol of standing up against oppression. Germany was split into smaller principalities with many rulers ruling over the people of that land. Some rulers took care of their people while others took advantage of theirs. Taking all of the goods and wealth for themselves and leaving their people to live in horrible conditions. They used Martin Luther’s stand against the Church as motivation to stand up to the oppressive and unfair rulers. This led to numerous peasant uprisings throughout the country. Luther’s stand against the Church showed German’s that you can stand up to those above you; even if they are bigger, stronger, and scarier. If you have a noble cause then you have to stand up for yourself and what you believe is right.

An interpretation of Luther in Worms.
http://www.concordianews.org/kids/2009/reform/worms.jpg

The belief that one’s relationship with God is a personal one is a belief I hold very dear to my heart. I do not conform to the traditional ways of worships by attending Church regularly or discussing my faith with others. It is a personal relationship I keep to myself. Taking my own time to read scripture and praying is some of the most precious time that I have to myself. I do not feel that I need anyone to validate my relationship with God. 

German Stereotypes

                A topic that struck me was the movement that the German humanists worked to remove the negative connotations associated with the word “German.”  In the first chapter we learned that the term German was given to barbarians from Northern regions of Europe. The association of Germans and barbarians did not seem to diminish throughout the years. Rumors circulated of German’s being drunken barbarians in Europe and scholars had a difficult time standing up to these vicious words. But, once the German humanists starting standing up for German’s as a people and a culture, it gave way to the ideals of German superiority.

Roman historian Tacitus wrote a history of early Germania. The German humanists used his writings to fuel improving the German name and culute.
http://www.historytoday.com/sites/default/files/tacitus.jpg

            One reason I found this small section worth thinking about further is that the negatives attached to being German back in the 15^th century and the same negatives that exist in today’s world. I think back to the first meeting we had as a group. Dr.Wolf asked us to describe what we thought of when we heard the word German or Germany. The negatives were drunks and Nazis. It would seem over thousands of years that Germany has not been able to shake the negatives, despite having a rich culture and a thriving pulse in the technology industry.

            The ideals of German superiority also continued to live on and came to a head during the rise of the Nazi party. The Germans wanted to be thought of as a strong people who deserved more than they were getting out of life. In order to feel superior and regain a name in the eyes of the world after WWI, the Nazis blamed someone else. It is easy to feel superior when you blame someone else for your troubles and take no responsibilities for your actions. That is exactly what happened in Germany. The Nazis also wanted to build Germany into a country rich with culture. However, they went about that by robbing fine art and artifacts from all of Europe. The Nazis did not find a way to make the German name strong once more. All they manage to do was reinforce the negative stereotypes that followed the name for so many years.

It is interesting to think that no matter how hard a group of people try to shake stereotypes, something always happens to reinforce those stereotypes. The German people continue to be haunted by their past and their origins. Whenever I share that I am studying German I am given a few responses; I am told it is an ugly, harsh language, someone makes a joke about beer, or someone brings up Nazis. But, that is why I study German because I want to teach people that Germany is more than its stereotypes.